School Stuff: Disagree That Ahmad Dhani Should Be Responsible On Dul's Action

Indonesia had many cases of an accident transportation. And the most part of it is driven by children underage. Actually they’re not allowed to drive before it’s the time. But many children underage drive car and motorbikes. Mostly underage children get accident when they ride, one of the causes is, they don’t have enough mental to drive a transportation. And they also haven’t got their licenses for driving. I disagree if Ahmad Dhani should responsible for his son’s action.

As we know, in that accident, Dul drove by his brother’s car, Al. His not 17 years old, he even haven’t get his driving license, but he dare to drive by him self to chaperon his girlfriend home with his friend. He asked his driver to go on holiday. He drove 105,8 km/h in midnight, its occur 00.45 AM with his friend, Naufal Samudra. The police saw tire tracks suspected car drift was jamming before he crashed into the toll barrier.

Dul’s family try to contact Dul that time, but he turned off his phone. Dhani is aware when Dul is driving. Because Dul don’t have enough mental to drive car. In his age, they still get panic of something that makes him shocked. When his friend see him, she asked how it is happened. And the last thing that Dul remembered was he trying to get in front of another car. Its not should be done by him. Because we can say, he still a beginner for driving. He made him (Dhani) expend a lot of money for him.

Many people said that Dul also haven’t got his permission from his dad while his out. And many people said that Ahmad Dhani must be blame. Because Dhani must take care of Dul. He must told Dul that he haven’t reach the age of 17 for driving and get driving license. Dhani is Dul’s father, and he must treated Dul as a normal child. Ahmad Dhani let his son drive by them self. He treated them to freely.

So, the conclusion is, dhani should not responsible of what his son did. He don’t asked his father permission when he went out, and his father tried to called him, but he turned off his phone. He drove 105,8 km/h in midnight, its occur 00.45 AM with his friend. He should not responsible of his son’s action. Because His son did it individually.

School Stuffs: Claim Report-Arthur Volupides’s Death

 With this report, we claim that Queenie Volupidez is lying about the death of his husband, Arthur Volupidez on the 21st of November 1971. Arthur’s body was found in his house at 02:00 AM in the morning by our crime scene investigator team.

That day, we arrived at Queenie’s house at 2.00 AM in the morning. There was no paramedics or any ambulance.  We found Queenie  with her friends inside that house and Arthur’s dead body on the stairs. His position was lying on his back, face up.

Queenie said that she had a tiff with his husband Arthur. Because she was sick of it, she went to the Country club using a dress. Then she went home from the club around 12.50 am, she arrived at home around 5 minutes later. When Queenie arrived home,  she saw her husband Arthur is lying on the bottom of the stairs, dead. She was shocked. 10 minutes later, her friends came. Queenie said that Arthur slipped when he wanted to take another glass of alcohol.

The autopsy found that Arthur have a wound on his head. He must have fell hard from the stairs. It’s a little weird that there is no bleeding in his head. And he was fell downstairs, usually people fell down the stairs they only got bruised. The autopsy also found that he’d been drunk. This supports the fact that he is holding a glass on his left hand.

In the crime scene we found some evidences that points towards the other way. We are pretty convinced that Queenie is lying. Why? Because we found that Arthur’s clothes are not disheveled. Usually, when people fall downstairs, their clothes become disheveled. There’s nothing on the stairs. When someone slips on something, usually there is something to slip on. And the glass in Arthur’s left hand is not broken. As a rule, when people fall downstairs they drop what they are holding.

The evidences clearly does not support what Queenie said happened. In the crime scene, as what we’ve stated before. Because when someone slips, usually there is something to slip on. Meanwhile there is nothing on the stairs. Nothing wet or slimy that Arthur might have slipped on. Second, the fact that the glass on Arthur’s hand in still whole and not broken is weird. As a rule, when people fall downstairs they drop what they are holding in order to grasp something still that can stop them from falling. It is a human reflex. Another thing is that there was no paramedics on the spot. Normally if somebody found a dead body or someone injured in their house, people will immediately contact the paramedics. And the last, but the biggest question just yet. According to Queenie, Arthur is falling down the stairs, But if thats the case Arthur should have fallen leg first instead of head first like what we find at the crime scene.

The conclusion is that Arthur was tripped by Queenie. Queenie and Arthur had a tiff. They must have hate each other in that time. Queen was tired being Arthur’s wife. Her motive is that Queenie is so angry to Arthur until She really wanted to hurt Arthur. But Queenie has gone too far. From wanting to hurt Arthur so bad, she killed him. Queenie did not call any Ambulance or police. It only took like 3 minutes to dial 911 and ask for help. But Queenie waited for 10 minutes. She waited for her friends. What did she do in that 10 minutes? We think that in that 10 minutes she cleaned the crime scene and moved any evidence that she can found such as fingerprints, and also blood.